The Users' Guide to the Health Reform Galaxy

« Bringing home the costs of doing nothing | Main | What Massachusetts teaches us about emergency departments and reform »

October 01, 2009

Lessons from Massachusetts about the impact of health reform

Sharon Long

Sharon Long of the Urban Institute writes about how health reform might change--or not change--the health insurance many people have.

I suppose I was naïve, but I really thought we’d be making progress on health reform this fall. Instead, we’re still mired in contentious debate based as much on fear as facts. One concern is the possibility that health reform could undermine employer-sponsored health insurance coverage—the backbone of the US health care system. Massachusetts, which has mounted an ambitious initiative with many of the same features currently under consideration at the national level, offers a real-world case study of what health reform can mean for employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) coverage.

The bottom line? ESI was not weakened once health care reform took hold in Massachusetts, which now enjoys the country’s lowest rate of uninsurance. Indeed, ample evidence suggests that the 2006 health care reform law significantly boosted ESI coverage, countering the trend toward lower ESI coverage in the rest of country.


In a new paper released today in Health Affairs, we look closely at how employers have responded to health care reform in Massachusetts. Using survey data from workers in the state, we find that Massachusetts employers continue to offer health insurance coverage: Roughly 90 percent of workers reported that their employer offers ESI coverage to one or more workers under health reform. That’s the same percentage that offered prior to health reform. What’s different now? Under health reform, more workers in Massachusetts report that their employer offered coverage to them and more workers are taking them up on that offer. As a result, ESI coverage statewide is up from 80% of workers prior to reform to 84% in fall 2008.

Besides these gains in ESI coverage, workers in Massachusetts continue to report high levels of satisfaction with their health plans, with roughly two-thirds rating their plan as very good or excellent. The evidence from Massachusetts suggests that health reform has expanded both the availability and quality of ESI coverage in the state.

All that said, we are finding that workers in small firms in Massachusetts are facing increasing health insurance premiums and higher out-of-pocket health spending as health care costs in the state have continued to rise, as they have in the rest of the county.  So far, workers in Massachusetts aren’t reporting that higher health care expenses are preventing them from getting the health care they need. But that is likely to change if costs continue to rise.

Finally, the rising health care premiums and increases in other out-of-pocket costs in Massachusetts don’t stem from health reform, rather they reflect the same factors that are driving higher health care costs in the rest of the country. Nevertheless, a critical next step for Massachusetts is to rein them in if it wants to sustain the significant gains in coverage that have been achieved under health reform and maintain its strong ESI system. Failing to address rising health care costs is likely to lead to a loss of ESI coverage in the future.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c975b53ef0120a607c0cf970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lessons from Massachusetts about the impact of health reform:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.

Inside this blog

The Users' Guide to the Health Reform Galaxy has closed down. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation will continue to navigate the blogosphere and will launch a new vessel on rwjf.org later this year. In the meantime, thanks for reading.

Archives by Date
Tags

DISCLAIMER. The content on this blog is posted by employees, grantees and people unrelated to the Foundation. The views expressed within this forum do not necessarily reflect the Foundation's positions, strategies or opinions. The Foundation cannot and does not verify or warrant the accuracy or completeness of the content.

Our mission here is to share information, and we take this mission seriously. While this is a privilege, it also is a responsibility. Part of that responsibility is ensuring that postings meet the guidelines consistent with the values of the community we serve. As a result, the Terms of Use guidelines have been developed and govern the responsible posting of content on this blog.

This blog offers Foundation staff an opportunity to cultivate new ideas and foster innovative thinking. While we encourage forum visitors to analyze, comment on and challenge our ideas and strategies, we expect all visitors to do so in the spirit of fairness and intellectual inquiry and to avoid personal attacks, libelous or defamatory posts and lobbying positions that are prohibited under the Foundation's tax-exempt status. All posters are expected to abide by the Terms of Use that apply to the Foundation’s Web site in general, which may be found at http://rwjfblogs.typepad.com/healthreform/terms-of-use.html.