The Users' Guide to the Health Reform Galaxy

« Health Reformer's Lexicon: Flexible Spending Accounts | Main | Health Reformer's Lexicon: High-Risk Pools »

April 16, 2010

Health Reformer's Lexicon: Value-Based Purchasing … and the latest from Health Wonk Review and Grand Rounds

The Health Reformer's Lexicon is a regular feature that examines key words, terms and phrases in health reform and explores their meaning and orbit.

Today’s term: Value-based purchasing.

According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, “the term basically refers to any purchasing practices aimed at improving the value of health care services, where value is a function of both quality and cost.” AHRQ continues: “It can be helpful to think about value as the result of quality divided by cost: Value = Quality ÷ Cost. This equation shows that value increases as quality increases, holding expenditure constant.”

The term is commonly associated with specific reforms such as pay-for-performance and discrete initiatives aimed at improving outcomes for a single disease or fraction of the population. But many health care experts argue value-based purchasing must be construed more broadly if it is to be an instrument of systemic reform. For example, the Urban Institute’s Robert Berenson and New America Foundation’s Len Nichols, writing in the Health Affairs blog, offer this definition: “Value-based purchasing uses a variety of tools to try to obtain the right kind and mix of services, of desired quality, at a reasonable cost.”

Why it matters: Susan DeVore, the CEO of the Premier healthcare alliance, has put it this way: “Cutting costs while improving care is the Holy Grail of health care reform.” And in the search for that Holy Grail, many health care policy experts believe value-based purchasing will be a critical tool.

Our current health care system, structured as it is around a fee-for-service model of reimbursement, rewards doctors and hospitals for the volume of services they provide, not the value of the care they deliver for patients or populations. This causes a host of problems, not least of which is overuse of health care services.  In the long run, health care reform can only be successful if the system rewards providers for giving patients the right care at the right time in the right way.

Roots: The concept of value-based purchasing has been gaining currency since the late 1990s as health care researchers and stakeholders have been systematically examining the design, implementation and outcomes of new purchasing strategies to replace fee-for-service.

Where the term appears: The newly enacted health care reform law establishes a hospital value-based purchasing program in Medicare to pay hospitals based on their performance on certain quality measures. The new law also calls for plans to be developed to implement similar value-based purchasing programs for skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies and ambulatory surgical centers.

Previous Lexicon entries include:
- Individual Mandate
- Uncompensated Care
- Flexible Spending Accounts

Meanwhile, in other news …

In this week’s Health Wonk Review on the HealthBlawg, David Harlow mentions our recent post on the definition of uncompensated care, joking that “Titanic doesn't even begin to capture the immenseness of the galaxy” when it comes to this topic. Also, the latest edition of Grand Rounds highlights Catherine Hess’ recent post on children’s health insurance coverage.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c975b53ef01347feaec2b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Health Reformer's Lexicon: Value-Based Purchasing … and the latest from Health Wonk Review and Grand Rounds:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.

Inside this blog

The Users' Guide to the Health Reform Galaxy has closed down. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation will continue to navigate the blogosphere and will launch a new vessel on rwjf.org later this year. In the meantime, thanks for reading.

Archives by Date
Tags

DISCLAIMER. The content on this blog is posted by employees, grantees and people unrelated to the Foundation. The views expressed within this forum do not necessarily reflect the Foundation's positions, strategies or opinions. The Foundation cannot and does not verify or warrant the accuracy or completeness of the content.

Our mission here is to share information, and we take this mission seriously. While this is a privilege, it also is a responsibility. Part of that responsibility is ensuring that postings meet the guidelines consistent with the values of the community we serve. As a result, the Terms of Use guidelines have been developed and govern the responsible posting of content on this blog.

This blog offers Foundation staff an opportunity to cultivate new ideas and foster innovative thinking. While we encourage forum visitors to analyze, comment on and challenge our ideas and strategies, we expect all visitors to do so in the spirit of fairness and intellectual inquiry and to avoid personal attacks, libelous or defamatory posts and lobbying positions that are prohibited under the Foundation's tax-exempt status. All posters are expected to abide by the Terms of Use that apply to the Foundation’s Web site in general, which may be found at http://rwjfblogs.typepad.com/healthreform/terms-of-use.html.